Prejudice — in plain language

a legal disadvantage or a permanent loss of the right to bring a claim or lawsuit again

From a fixed, curated glossary of 7,257 legal terms. Not legal advice. How it's made: plainlanguage.us/trust

Plain language

a legal disadvantage or a permanent loss of the right to bring a claim or lawsuit again

  • harm to a legal right
  • permanent loss of a claim
  • legal disadvantage
  • without losing the right to sue

What to watch for

  • The everyday meaning ('bias') is completely different from the legal meaning ('legal harm' or 'finality'). Translators must never assume the reader understands the legal context.
  • Translating 'without prejudice' as 'without bias' is a common error that renders the legal document nonsensical. It must be translated as 'without losing the right to sue' or 'without hurting your legal position.'
  • Non-lawyers often fail to realize that a dismissal 'with prejudice' is a final, irreversible loss of their day in court.

Distinguishing from Everyday Meaning. The word "prejudice" is a classic "false friend." In common conversation, it means bigotry or bias. In law, it almost always relates to the status of a claim or the preservation of a right. Always check if the term is being used to describe a person's attitude (everyday) or the status of a legal claim (legal).

The Importance of "With" vs. "Without". The legal effect of the word changes entirely based on the preposition that precedes it: "With prejudice" = Finality. The door is locked. "Without prejudice" = Flexibility. The door remains open for future action.

What to Watch For. When you see "without prejudice" in a letter or contract, it is often a protective shield. It means the person writing the document is saying, "I am doing this or saying this now, but I am not giving up my right to take a different position or sue you later." If you translate it as "without bias," you lose the entire protective function of the phrase.

In a legal context, "prejudice" refers to a harm to a person's legal rights or the permanent loss of the ability to pursue a claim. It is most commonly used to describe whether a court case is finished forever or if it can be brought back to court later.

Meanings by context

everyday English: A negative bias or unfair judgment against someone.

with prejudice: The case is closed forever; you cannot sue over this same issue again.

without prejudice: You are allowed to bring this claim again later, or your current action does not hurt your future legal rights.

Examples

Plain: The court closed the case permanently, and the person who sued cannot bring this same claim to court ever again.

Plain: Making this payment does not mean the Landlord is giving up their right to collect the rest of the money owed later.

Plain: Agreeing to this settlement does not hurt either side's legal arguments or rights in any future lawsuits.

Where you'll see it

  • court orders
  • settlement agreements
  • contract negotiations
  • legal correspondence
  • res judicata
  • dismissal
  • waiver
  • estoppel
  • standing

Word details

Pronunciation
PREH-juh-dis
Part of speech
noun
Origin
Latin — from 'praejudicium' — a previous judgment
Domains
civil procedure, contract law, litigation
Frequency
very common
Formality
high

Have a whole document? Paste it at plainlanguage.us — every legal term explained at once. Free, no signup.

Need this as JSON? The Developer API returns definition cards with exact offsets — $0.0025/operation. → /docs