Said — in plain language
a word used to refer back to a person, thing, or document that was already mentioned earlier in the same text
From a fixed, curated glossary of 7,257 legal terms. Not legal advice. How it's made: plainlanguage.us/trust
Plain language
a word used to refer back to a person, thing, or document that was already mentioned earlier in the same text
- the
- that
- this
- the previously mentioned
What to watch for
- Non-lawyers often find the use of 'said' to be archaic or confusing, leading them to wonder if it refers to something spoken aloud. It does not; it is purely a pointer to text written earlier.
- Translators often leave 'said' in place because it is a 'legal term,' but it is actually a stylistic crutch that makes documents harder to read. It should almost always be replaced with 'the' or 'that'.
- Using 'said' can create ambiguity if multiple items were mentioned previously. Replacing it with a specific noun (e.g., 'the company' instead of 'said company') is safer and clearer.
Why This Term Is Used. Lawyers use "said" to avoid repeating long, complex descriptions. For example, instead of writing "the property located at 123 Maple Street, owned by John Doe," a lawyer will write "said property" later in the document to refer back to that specific description.
What to Watch For.
- Clarity over formality: In modern plain-language drafting, "said" is increasingly viewed as unnecessary clutter. If you are translating a document for a general audience, you should almost always replace "said" with "the," "this," or "that."
- Ambiguity: If a document mentions two different people or two different dates, using "said" can be dangerous because it might not be clear which one you are referring to. In those cases, it is better to repeat the noun (e.g., "the first date" or "the second date") rather than using "said."
Common Misunderstandings by Non-Lawyers.
- "Does 'said' mean the person actually said it out loud?" (No — it is strictly a reference to text that appeared earlier in the document.)
- "Is 'said' required to make a contract legal?" (No — it is a stylistic choice, not a legal requirement.)
Legal definition
In legal writing, "said" is used as a pointer to refer back to something that was already described earlier in the document. It is a formal way of saying "the one I just talked about." It does not mean that anything was actually spoken out loud.
Examples
Legal: The parties hereto in any number of separate counterparts and all of said counterparts shall be deemed an original.
Plain: The parties may sign separate copies of this agreement, and all those copies together will count as one original document.
Legal: If the amount is not paid within said ten-day period, it shall bear interest.
Plain: If the amount is not paid within that ten-day period, it will start to earn interest.
Legal: The fact that Indemnitee was a director of the Company (or served in any of said capacities)...
Plain: The fact that the person being protected was a director of the company (or served in any of those roles)...
Where you'll see it
- commercial contracts
- court filings
- property deeds
- insurance policies
Related terms
- aforesaid
- aforementioned
- such
Word details
- Pronunciation
- SED
- Part of speech
- adjective
- Origin
- Old English — past participle of 'say' — previously mentioned
- Domains
- contract law, litigation, real property, administrative law
- Frequency
- very common
- Formality
- high
Have a whole document? Paste it at plainlanguage.us — every legal term explained at once. Free, no signup.
Need this as JSON? The Developer API returns definition cards with exact offsets — $0.0025/operation. → /docs